October 13, 2025

Why Finding Data Talent Is So Bloody Hard

The brutal truth about hiring data talent

Last week I spoke to a fintech founder who’s spent six months — six! — trying to hire a decent Senior Data Engineer. I asked how it was going. The response: “Every candidate is either underwhelming, overpriced, or vanishes at final interview.”

I didn’t know whether to offer therapy or tequila.

If you’re scaling a startup and hiring data, BI, or analytics talent feels like running an obstacle course blindfolded, it’s not just you. Something fundamental is broken in how early-stage and scale-up companies approach data hiring. You’re not bad at hiring. The system just isn’t built for you.

Let’s unpack why data hiring is so damn hard — and what founders and teams can do about it.

Your JD reads like a sad Wikipedia entry

If your job spec uses phrases like “synergise enterprise data flows” or “support robust data infrastructure in a dynamic environment,” congrats — you’ve officially written a poem only ChatGPT can love.

Great candidates don’t get excited about buzzwords. They get excited about impact. Story. Mission. Real problems to solve.

Instead of 40 bullet points about tools and tech stacks, try this:

• Explain the mission: What’s your company's endgame? What role does data play in making it happen?
• Be honest about chaos: Are you early in your data maturity? That’s OK — some people love building from scratch.
• Make it tangible: “You’ll help us unify 5+ data sources so our ops team stops making decisions in spreadsheets.” Much better.

Job descriptions aren't legal contracts. They're your pitch. Write like you’re trying to hire someone smarter than you — because you are.

Stop fishing in the same LinkedIn swamp

Here's the secret everyone forgets: the best data talent isn’t just sitting on job boards refreshing openings like they’re waiting for Glastonbury tickets to drop.

The ones you really want to hire? They're:

• Already in a job. Probably swamped. Definitely not clicking 'Apply' on your career page.
• Incredibly niche — and often overlooked by automated sourcing tools.
• Swimming among confusing job titles that make discovery a joke (raise your hand if you’ve ever wondered what a ‘Data Ninja’ actually does).

If your hiring playbook is: “post on LinkedIn, pray, repeat” — no wonder you’re stuck.

Better play: use specialist recruiters (yep, like us). Or get serious about outbound. That means tailored outreach, mapped talent pools, and a compelling founder voice. No spam. Just signal.

You’re interviewing like it's 2010

Technical interview. Take-home task. Final with the CTO. That should work, right?

Wrong — not if your process:

• Takes three weeks to decide if a candidate passes a tech screen
• Includes a 6-hour off-site but still ends with “we’re not quite sure…”
• Assumes brilliant data people are brilliant performers in interviews (spoiler: not always)

Remember: you're not just assessing skills. You’re selling the opportunity. Candidates are judging you — hard — on speed, clarity, and vibe.

Here’s a simple framework we coach clients on:

The 4 Cs of a Great Hiring Experience:
Clarity — what’s the process, timeline, and expectation?
Consistency — same people, same questions, same scoring rubrics.
Candour — be honest about what’s hard or messy in the role.
Conversion — treat top candidates like top customers.

Your definition of “qualified” is outdated

Here’s a hot take: obsessing over specific tech stack experience is a sneaky way to make yourself less competitive.

“Must have 7 years in Snowflake, dbt, and Looker” is silly when:

• Looker wasn’t even relevant 7 years ago
• The best data folks learn fast and love new tools
• Tech stacks shift every 18 months anyway

Want a better filter? Focus on these instead:

• Pattern-matching skills — have they built in similar-stage companies?
• Problem-solving mindset — how do they tackle open-ended, messy challenges?
• Communication & stakeholder skills — data’s useless if no one uses it

I once placed a sharp analyst from retail into a climate tech scale-up with zero domain overlap. Guess what? They crushed it — because mindset > toolkit every time.

Xist4 Takeaways — no fluff

• Write JDs like recruitment love letters, not court filings
• Be proactive — the best people aren’t applying
• Streamline your interview process or lose out
• Hire for capability and stage-fit, not tool checklists

If it feels like finding strong data talent is harder than launching a rocket, good news: you’re not crazy. The hiring market is warped, hyped, noisy. But it’s not hopeless — if you change how you play the game.

The talent is out there. But you’ve got to match their energy.

If you're tired of ghosted candidates, sloppy pipelines, or just want someone to cut the BS — well, that’s why I built Xist4. Let’s talk.

Back to news