Why AI Hype Won't Replace Great Hiring - Xist4

November 24, 2025

Why AI Hype Won’t Replace Great Hiring

AI is having its Beyoncé moment

Walk into any investor meeting, conference, or comment section and you'll see it: AI mania. ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude—every founding team’s whispering sweet nothings to their pitch decks about machine intelligence, AGI, dogs that code, and the rest of it.

TechRadar's AI Week is the latest proof: beginner guides, features, reviews. The lot. And don’t get me wrong—I’m a fan. I wouldn’t kick GPT-4 out of a brainstorm. But here’s what’s bugging me…

Founders are treating AI like it’s going to solve their hiring mess.

Let me say this loud and clear: It won’t.

Here’s why the AI hype is a dangerous distraction in the hiring game—and what smart founders should really be focusing on if they want to win the talent war in 2026.

AI can screen CVs, not people

Sure, AI tools can parse a CV in half a millisecond, but you know what they can’t do? Sniff out a bullsh*t artist who looks great on paper but melts in a startup environment. Or spot the low-ego genius who’s perfect for your early-stage data team.

Big Five traits, cultural calibration, nuance of ambition—these aren’t in the job description, but they’re exactly what makes a candidate thrive (or crash) at your company.

And no offence to the AI lads, but you need human pattern matching experience for that. The kind of pattern recognition that comes from sitting across from a thousand candidates and seeing what works, who flakes, and who’s full of hot air.

AI scans keywords. I scan character.

Recruitment isn’t plumbing. It’s matchmaking

There’s this dangerous assumption that hiring is just a process problem, and AI will "streamline" it into solved territory. But in early-stage tech, hiring isn’t plugging a leak. It’s matchmaking at high stakes and high velocity.

You’re not hiring for a job. You’re hiring for a role that doesn’t fully exist yet, in a team that's evolving constantly, for missions that shift quarterly.

How on Earth is a ChatGPT plugin supposed to get that? The brief isn’t "Find me a Data Scientist." It’s:

  • Can they go from zero to one in a messy data environment?
  • Will they freak out when the roadmap pivots (again)?
  • Do they actually want to work at a climate fintech, or are they just desperate to run from their last startup implosion?

No CV parser on planet Earth is answering that. A mouthy recruiter who knows your space inside out just might.

Founders: stop outsourcing judgement

This is a spicy one. But founders—especially first-time founders in love with the AI hype—are leaning way too hard on tools to make decisions they should own.

I spoke to a Greentech CTO last week who told me they run all candidates through a prompt-engineered interview flow with an LLM. It was "efficient”.

Four weeks later, they hired someone who had the right answers—but zero initiative. Total robot-vibes. You know what the irony was?

They were replaced by a robot after three months.

Judgement isn’t scalable via API. You can't outsource gut feel. And seriously—when your company is 27 people and hiring for your first Security Ops Lead, are you really comfortable asking ChatGPT who to trust with root access?

The AI that matters most: Actual Insight

Let me throw a lifeline to AI fans before they storm my inbox. I’m not a Luddite. AI’s useful. I use it. But let’s make the distinction: It's a tool, not a strategy.

Here’s what smart founders are doing instead of leaning on the AI hype when hiring:

  • Clarifying roles like a boss: Tough convos with co-founders about what’s actually needed. Not what sounds sexy in a job spec.
  • Hiring for trajectory, not titles: Optimising for people who want to grow with the role, not those who’ve done it 9 times and are bored.
  • Sifting on behaviours, not buzzwords: “Tell me about a time when everything broke and your PM cried” vibes—not just stack flexing.
  • Using recruiters who challenge, not cheerlead: Someone who calls out your bad brief, points out better candidates you missed, and asks the uncomfortable questions.

Want an AI-powered assist in hiring? Ask yourself:

  • Do I know what excellence looks like in this role at this stage?
  • Am I being seduced by credentials over evidence?
  • Would I still hire this person if AI didn’t exist?

Wrap up: hire like a human (or hire one who can)

The future’s bright. The future’s AI. But if you’re building a lean, world-class tech team today, remember this:

AI may help you move fast, but when it comes to hiring—speed without judgement is a hiring disaster dressed as progress.

The cost of one bad hire in an early-stage team? Distraction. Missed deadlines. Toxic team dynamics. Oh—and usually at least £30K down the drain. All because you trusted a tool that couldn’t ask: “Why do you actually want this job?”

Fancy finding someone who can? You know where to reach me.

—Gozie Ezulike



Back to news