January 29, 2026
AI Upskilling Can’t Fix a Broken Hiring Funnel
Nice One, Rishi – But That’s Not Where the Problem Is
So the UK government wants to educate 10 million Brits in AI. Not to become prompt engineers or Stanford ML alumni, mind you — just to use AI tools better at work. Cheers for that.
Don’t get me wrong. Raising the national digital IQ is a good thing. But let’s not pretend this solves the bigger issue: companies still can’t hire AI-savvy talent fast enough — or effectively enough — to actually make a dent. And that’s costing them big time.
This initiative is like handing out more umbrellas during a flood. Helpful, but not addressing the crumbling dam up the road.
Here’s why chucking free courses at the public isn’t the miracle the government thinks it is — and what founders, tech leaders, and hiring managers should care about more instead.
The Real AI Skills Gap? It's in Hiring, Not Learning
Every founder I speak to lately has an AI story: they want to automate workflows, launch new ML products, or turbocharge their data ops. All noble goals. And yet the same three complaints keep cropping up:
- "We can’t find candidates with the right AI skills."
- "Everyone wants a unicorn who can code, model and sell."
- "We've wasted months interviewing people who aren’t even close."
Notice what’s missing? Not once have I heard: “If only more people had free AI training from the government.”
Because the block isn’t knowledge. It’s connecting the right talent to the right problems with commercial urgency. And traditional hiring methods — the sprayed CVs, the lazy job specs, the endless generic interviews — are completely unfit for purpose.
The Fallacy of Mass AI Upskilling
Let’s spell it out. 10 million people don't need a light touch intro to ChatGPT. What high-growth tech companies really need are:
- Machine Learning Engineers who can productionise models, not just fine-tune a Hugging Face template.
- Data Scientists who understand experimental design and stakeholder influence — not just Python pandas one-liners.
- Product Designers fluent in integrating AI into UX flows, with the taste and nerve to ship meaningful tools.
You don't get that from a government webinar. That comes from hard-earned, rare experience — and from hiring specialists who know how to spot it.
Otherwise, we’re going to flood the market with a whole lot of “AI literate” noise — and still no idea how to hire the people who count.
The Funnel Is the Faultline
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: most AI hiring funnels are designed to exclude the most capable candidates, not attract them.
They’re bloated with vague JDs full of buzzwords (“transform! optimise! scale!”), riddled with hiring manager indecision, and waste weeks on rounds of tepid interviews with barely any signal generated.
If you're a CTO building AI capability, or a founder needing someone who can stitch LLMs into your product roadmap — speed and accuracy matter more than ever. And your hiring funnel probably isn’t giving you either.
Here’s how to spot the cracks:
- Your process takes 4+ weeks from brief to offer — too slow in this space.
- You’re seeing candidates who are all CV-fluff, no business impact.
- You’re waiting for a unicorn, when you could be hiring a gritty builder.
Forget AI bootcamps. Fix that funnel first.
What to Do Instead: Smart Hiring for Smart Tech
So what should you focus on if you actually want to win the AI hiring race in 2024?
Here’s my cheat sheet for founders, COOs and CTOs:
🔍 Sharpen the brief
Be specific about outcomes. Don’t just say “must know AI.” Say “needs to architect & deploy GenAI features for our SME clients with limited data.” Now you’ve narrowed the field to people who know what matters.
🚀 Accelerate decision-making
In-demand AI talent doesn’t window-shop for months. Shorten the loop. Compress interviews. Get crystal clear on what good looks like before the first CV lands.
🎯 Use specialist recruiters (yes, like us)
The market’s noisy, and the best candidates aren’t applying to your job post on LinkedIn. They're being headhunted. This is where niche recruiters who live and breathe AI roles give you the edge. We know who’s legit — and who's faking demos on GitHub.
🧠 Don’t chase prestige, hire for impact
Fancy creds don’t always land commercial value. I’ve placed ex-bootcampers who outperform PhDs because they ship like maniacs and talk like humans. Choose doers over theoreticians.
The Wrap: Train the Nation, Sure — But Hire Smarter Now
I’m all for levelling up digital skills across the country. But let’s be real: it won’t move the needle for founders trying to launch next-gen AI products today.
You don’t need 10 million ChatGPT pros. You need 1 or 2 highly capable hires who can get AI working in your business right now.
And that’s not a government initiative. That’s a hiring strategy. Built for signal, not noise. Built for speed, not bureaucracy. Built for outcomes, not optics.
If you’re hiring for AI talent and feel like you’re wading through treacle — drop me a line. We’ve cracked the code, stayed close to the doers, and we bring the thunder when it counts.
Because the future won’t be built by mass webinars. It’ll be built by the high-leverage people you trust enough to hire today.
Back to news